The Supreme Court of the United States had spoken - and it had spoken favorably. In and out of State and Federal courts for over twenty-five years, nudists ultimately won their inalienable right to promote nudism pictorially as well as in text. 45,0K views 64,2 35:21 Silver fox gets a hard. 40,8K views 71,6 15:59 Fat old dude enjoying mind-altering oral sex. 40,3K views 67,6 06:10 Older bears in hot anal banging. 36,9K views 70,3 19:06 Two silver foxes having some fun together. It was against this background that many legal difficulties vis a vis the nudist press were interposed. 28,2K views 75,7 20:29 Old men skip the opera and fuck instead. It would be absurd for an official nudist publication to proclaim the wholesome character of the nude form only to air-brush the genital organs merely to placate Victorian prudes. To retouch pictorial renditions of the body, then, would constitute a grave breach of professed nudist doctrine. Now, a photograph purports to be nothing more or less than a representation of the subject if the subject is clean and wholesome, its pictorial representation must of necessity be equally clean and wholesome.
Nor is any portion of the anatomy in of itself obscene.
Is basic to nudist philosophy that the nude human body is not indecent per se. The nudists’ right to illustrate their journal with unretouched photographs posed a very sticky ethical dilemma.
